Introduction

Detektor Security Academy is an educational concept in which Detektor magazine, together with selected security technology leaders, have cooperated to produce, distribute and promote essential information about the opportunities that today’s security technology can offer.

In this, the first of several educational articles, the Detektor Security Academy, sponsored by Axis Communications, will explain how to get an optimal image quality and a cost-effective video surveillance solution for different video surveillance applications.


Despite the recession video surveillance is still a fast-growing sub-sector of the security industry. The growth of network video surveillance products is in particular impressive, even though it has declined from 40 percent last year to less than 30 percent 2009, according to a report from IMS Research. Very few industries would complain about having a growth of 29 percent!

The fast developments of new camera products, with improved or new features, offer an increasing number of opportunities for different security applications. However, the basic for an efficient surveillance system is of course the quality of the images, produced by the installed camera equipment.

 

Image Quality - a matter of usability

– how to get the best, and most cost-effective video surveillance results

In recent years megapixel cameras have often been mentioned as the key to solve the problem of poor image quality in video surveillance systems. That is not really true. There are many factors to take into consideration in order to get an optimal image quality. First of all the term “image quality” need to be defined. The usability, for the end user, is probably the best reference when measuring image quality.

By Johan Paulsson

Global recession notwithstanding, video surveillance has been the fastest-growing sector in the security industry for nearly a decade, with both private and governmental organizations around the world investing large sums of money.

Several factors drive the explosive growth, and they hinge just as often on cost controls and cost-effective management as they do on the citizenry's need for a greater sense of safety in the post-9/11 world. A far cry from the days of closed analog CCTV systems, today’s digital video surveillance cameras operate over flexible, easily scalable IP networks that authorized users can access in real time from just about anywhere. Using industry-standard, reliable, vendor-independent technology, they are easy and cost-effective to integrate. In today’s network video systems, intelligence resides throughout the system, not least at “the edge” (i.e. in the camera or video encoder) itself, which enables it to determine when and where to send video, at what frame rate and resolution, and when to alert a specific operator for monitoring and/or response. The result: surveillance systems that are cost-effective, future-proof and adaptable to the evolving needs of the installations they serve.

It is, of course, the digital revolution that makes this all possible. And, just as newer, more powerful, more feature-loaded cameras, laptops and mobile phones constantly tempt today’s consumer, the network video market is regularly bombarded with new product offerings that promise ever-greater benefits for the user.

Taking the user-centric view

Image quality is often foremost among the touted benefits. Just like their counterparts in the consumer goods market, many of today’s surveillance camera manufacturers are in a race to deliver product with higher and higher image resolution. The supposition is: the higher the number, the sharper the image and the greater the satisfaction for the end-user.

What this approach roundly ignores is the actual needs of the application. Do you want overview surveillance, or detailed images? Will video be viewed live, or logged and stored for months – or even years? IP networks must be able to handle the traffic load of high-resolution video, and storage requirements can quickly expand to terabytes, so these are critical considerations.

Six steps

There are six simple, sequential steps to creating a successful video surveillance solution for the end-user. The first two should precede any equipment, software or systems decisions. The third and fourth should fulfill the decisions made, and the last two take place during the commissioning of the customer’s video surveillance system. The consultant’s or integrator’s professional expertise will determine if everything is done right, and is a valuable safeguard for a cost-effective life-cycle video surveillance investment.

It all starts with a thorough analysis of actual user needs.

1. Goal definition

Only by carefully analyzing your video surveillance goals can you define the right requirements for your installation.

Before selecting equipment or systems, the first step is to define how the results will be used. Do you need a general overview of an area or people’s movements, or high detail (facial- or license plate recognition, for example)? Complete installations often include both, so it is important to consider each in its own context to achieve the most effective solution.

No single type of camera is optimal for every application. The best solution often combines HDTV network cameras, megapixel network cameras and standard resolution network cameras that are optimized for different needs – such as pan/tilt/zoom, extreme light sensitivity or cost-efficiency.

To optimize an installation you must also consider the whole system, not just the cameras, because factors like video management software, network capacity and video storage requirements often set limits for image resolution and frame rate.

2. Scene analysis

Once you have defined your overall goals, determine the requirements for individual cameras for each application. In addition to the level of detail, consider:

3. Camera selection

The cameras you choose are the major step to completely satisfactory fulfillment of your video surveillance goals. Take time to understand this complex subject area, in order to make the best-informed camera choice.

Image resolution is a critical technical feature of any network camera, and the one that has received the most ‘buzz’ in the past couple of years. From this perspective, there are essentially three categories of network cameras: megapixel, HDTV (high-definition television) and standard resolution (analog CCTV cameras connected via video encoders fit into this last category too).

Megapixel network cameras are an adaptation of industry best practice, but do not follow any standard. The ‘number’ of megapixels refers specifically to the number of image sensor elements in the camera. Megapixel network cameras can provide extreme image detail, but often at a lower frame rate, and some can even deliver different video streams from different areas of the same image. Good megapixel applications include overview surveillance in banks, transportation hubs and other premises.

HDTV network cameras deliver a pleasing image, with full frame-rate, excellent color representation and wide-screen (16:9) format. True HDTV cameras fulfill key parts of industry standards such as SMPTE. HDTV is ideal when full frame rate is needed – for airports, casinos, city surveillance and passport controls.

Standard resolution is usually VGA (640 x 480 pixels) or a multiple of it, and is the ‘oldest’ category in the network video surveillance camera market. But its use is still both current and valid: with a powerful optical zoom, a VGA camera fully answers many monitoring needs; in difficult lighting, a VGA camera with extreme light sensitivity and wide dynamic range can outperform both HDTV and megapixel cameras; some VGA cameras provide frame rates higher than 25-30 frames per second – perfect for capturing fast-moving objects.

Regardless of category, the following factors are critical, and need to be considered when choosing a camera:

4. Camera mounting

Correct camera mounting ensures that image quality can achieve its full potential. Professional expertise is needed to achieve an optimal installation, but here are some factors to consider when planning a camera’s position.

5. Camera configuration

Configuring means tuning, or fine-tuning, your installed cameras, so you can make the most of them. With the Axis camera range this is easy, thanks to such features as:

6. Viewing screen calibration

You can only fully appreciate surveillance video when your computer screen or TV is correctly calibrated. Check these four points to ensure your viewing screen is correctly calibrated:

Conclusion

To get the best video surveillance installation, image usability must be the first consideration as well as the litmus test for all other decisions. This is easy to achieve if project development follows the right sequence, and the results will likely be more satisfying and cost-effective too.

 

About the author and sponsor

Johan Paulsson is Chief Technology Officer of Axis Communications, the global market leader in network video.

Axis Communications, a Swedish-based company, was first to bring the benefits of network video technology to professional video surveillance and remote monitoring applications, and is driving the ongoing shift from analog to network video. The world’s first network camera was launched by Axis in 1996. With more than two decades of experience in networking technologies, Axis has the largest installed base of network video products, as well as strong partnerships with leading players in more than 70 countries across all continents. Axis sets great store in a business model that involves working closely with more than 27,000 surveillance channel partners, integrators and consultants around the world.

“The partners we work with will be serving their customers for years to come, so it’s critical to them to provide surveillance solutions that fully respond to customers’ wishes and defined needs, and that are effective, reliable, cost-efficient and future-safe. Our continuous dialogue with partners, as well as end users, motivates a slightly different take on image quality: image usability,” says Johan Paulsson.

“Image quality is critical, of course, but the actual benefits you derive from video surveillance will depend to a very large degree on how you use your images. That’s why Axis focuses on ensuring that video can be optimized for the purposes each installation requires, so both our partners and the end users can benefit fully, ” Johan Paulsson concludes.

Founded in 1984, Axis is listed on the OMX Nordic Exchange, Large Cap and Information Technology.

 

For more detail, view an in-depth presentation of the Axis take on image quality at: www.axis.com/imageusability